When the providing care manager reviews the compensation and pension (C&P) results, and does not note any inconsistencies, what should the PCM do?

• A. Rewrite the narrative/summary (NARSUM) in the approved Air Force format
• B. Submit an addendum stating there were no inconsistencies
• C. Endorse the NARSUM, stating it is current and complete
• D. The provider is not required to review the C&P results

Answer: (C)

The main idea is that the PCM should officially endorse the Narrative Summary (NARSUM) when the C&P results show no inconsistencies. Endorsing the NARSUM, stating it is current and complete, communicates that the PCM has reviewed the findings and finds the documentation accurate and up to date for the rating decision. There’s no need to rewrite the NARSUM in another format if the existing document already meets the approved Air Force format and clearly captures the necessary information. Submitting an addendum isn’t required when there’s nothing to modify or add; addenda are used to address changes or new issues, not to reiterate that everything is in order. The provider is indeed responsible for reviewing the C&P results, and a clear endorsement confirms that review. If inconsistencies were found, the appropriate step would be to address them and revise as needed, but with none present, endorsement is the proper action.